The submission presented on August 4, 2025, by Iraq representing the G77 + China, a negotiating group of which Brazil is a member, proposes the theme, subthemes and guiding questions for the fourth Dialogue of the United Arab Emirates Just Transition Work Program (UAE JTWP).

The group reiterates that the debate should fully cover element (b) of decision 3/CMA.5, which addresses just and equitable transitions involving energy, socioeconomic, workforce, and other dimensions, always based on national priorities and including social protection mechanisms to mitigate adverse impacts. Furthermore, it advocates that the cross-cutting element (g) of the same decision, previously agreed upon as a permanent agenda, be equally addressed. The submission also emphasizes the importance of transparent processes in the selection of experts, with the inclusion of representatives from the Global South, especially in the areas of energy access, clean cooking (relating to the use of cooking technologies and fuels that significantly reduce emissions and household air pollution), affordability, energy reliability and security, social protection, and negative impact assessment.

In the first axis, on just and equitable transitions that integrate multiple dimensions, the G77 + China argues that the scope of the JTWP should not be limited to the energy sector, but should reflect the complexity of national development, equally addressing sectors such as infrastructure, transport, agriculture, mining, trade, education, and health. It emphasizes that these transitions must be anchored in national priorities, promote resilience and adaptation, and rely on robust social protection mechanisms for workers and communities. Issues such as combating systemic inequalities, including the informal sector, upskilling the workforce, creating decent jobs, and ensuring universal access to reliable, safe, and affordable energy are highlighted.

The second axis addresses the development of national just transition pathways based on sustainable development and poverty eradication. The group proposes that these pathways build on existing national strategies and public policies, such as NDCs, NAPs, and adaptation communications, and be designed to accelerate long-term objectives, incorporating local knowledge and indigenous practices. Guiding questions include how to balance the need for a just transition with immediate socioeconomic challenges and how to leverage technology transfer to vulnerable countries.

In the third axis, the submission addresses international cooperation and means of implementation as central elements in enabling just transitions. The G77 + China reinforces that financing, training, and technology transfer must be adequate, predictable, and aligned with the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities. It criticizes developed countries' failure to fulfill their support obligations, noting that such failures make any transition unfair. It also proposes exploring bilateral and multilateral cooperation mechanisms to develop inclusive and integrated institutional capacities.

The fourth axis highlights the negative impacts of unilateral restrictive trade measures, which, according to the group, compromise the equity of transitions and harm developing countries. The text proposes strategies to mitigate or reverse these impacts, strengthen multilateralism, and prevent these measures from limiting the ability to implement just transition policies.

The fifth axis addresses the institutional arrangements needed to support the implementation of just transitions. The G77 + China proposes the creation of robust structures, such as platforms or networks, that promote cooperation, facilitate knowledge exchange, and direct support in a transparent and inclusive manner at the international, national, and subnational levels. It also emphasizes the importance of ensuring the participation of all stakeholders and UNFCCC constituencies in policy formulation and implementation.

The submission concludes by advocating for a holistic approach that unites all dimensions of the just transition, aligns with national priorities, effectively utilizes international cooperation and means of implementation, and protects against the negative impacts of unilateral trade measures. The G77 + China expects the fourth JTWP Dialogue to be focused, action-oriented, and capable of generating concrete results for a truly just transition.